FlashFi vs Ghostfolio: Managed Service or Self-Hosted?

Disclosure: FlashFi is a competitor to the products mentioned.

Disclosure: FlashFi is a competitor. This is our honest assessment based on publicly available information.

TL;DR

Choose Ghostfolio if you are technical, want full control over your data, and are comfortable running Docker, PostgreSQL, and Redis on your own infrastructure. You get a capable portfolio tracker for free (self-hosted) or about $15/year (cloud).

Choose FlashFi if you want a managed service with zero setup, personal finance features beyond portfolio tracking, and a product built specifically for digital nomads managing money across currencies and countries.

Quick Comparison

Feature FlashFi Ghostfolio
Price $12/mo ($144/yr) Free (self-hosted) / ~$15/yr (cloud)
Premium price $39/mo ($468/yr) ~$15/yr (one tier)
Open source No Yes (AGPL-3.0)
Self-hosted option No Yes (Docker)
Setup required None (sign up and go) Docker + PostgreSQL + Redis
Stocks & ETFs Yes Yes
Crypto Yes Yes
Mutual funds Yes Limited
Multi-currency Yes (real-time FX) Yes (historical FX)
Cash accounts Yes (multi-currency) Basic (portfolio cash only)
Debt tracking Yes No
Savings tracking Yes No
Net worth Yes (investments + personal finance) Yes (investments only)
Performance analytics Yes Yes (detailed)
Portfolio rebalancing No Yes
Risk analysis No Yes (Fire calculator)
Transaction import Manual entry CSV import + manual
Data providers Tiingo Yahoo Finance, CoinGecko, EOD Historical Data, others
Mobile Web (mobile-first) PWA (mobile-first)
Maintenance None (managed) You handle updates, backups, uptime

Pricing Breakdown

Ghostfolio’s pricing model is unique because the core product is open source:

FlashFi’s pricing:

The price gap is real. If cost is your primary concern and you can self-host, Ghostfolio at $0/year is hard to argue against. Even the cloud version at $15/year is a fraction of FlashFi’s cost. The question is what you get for the difference.

Setup and Maintenance

This is the core trade-off between these two products.

Ghostfolio self-hosted requires a server or NAS running Docker (Linux recommended, supports amd64 and arm64). You run three containers via Docker Compose: the Ghostfolio app, PostgreSQL 15, and Redis. You configure environment variables (database credentials, JWT secrets, data provider API keys) and handle ongoing maintenance — updates, backups, uptime monitoring, and troubleshooting.

If you already run a homelab, adding Ghostfolio is straightforward. If “Docker Compose” is not in your vocabulary, the learning curve is steep. The cloud version ($15/year) eliminates the infrastructure work but you lose the data sovereignty that makes self-hosting appealing.

FlashFi is a standard SaaS product. Create an account, log in, start adding holdings. Nothing to install, configure, or maintain. The trade-off is that your data lives on FlashFi’s servers and you pay $12/month for the convenience.

Portfolio Tracking

Both tools handle the core job competently, but Ghostfolio goes deeper on investment-specific analytics.

Ghostfolio offers multi-account tracking across brokerages, performance measurement across multiple timeframes (today, WTD, MTD, YTD, 1Y, 5Y, max), portfolio composition by asset class/region/sector, dividend tracking, rebalancing tools, risk analysis with a FIRE calculator, and CSV import for bulk transaction loading. It supports multiple data providers including Yahoo Finance, CoinGecko, and EOD Historical Data.

FlashFi covers real-time pricing via Tiingo (stocks, ETFs, mutual funds, crypto), portfolio allocation by type/sector/holding, performance charts (1W/1M/3M/ALL), transaction history with cost basis tracking, and multi-currency conversion on every holding.

For pure investment analytics, Ghostfolio has an edge with rebalancing and risk analysis. FlashFi’s investment tracking is solid but less specialized on the analytics side.

Personal Finance

This is where the products diverge significantly.

Ghostfolio is a portfolio tracker. It tracks investments and calculates net worth from those investments. It can hold cash balances within portfolio accounts, but it does not have standalone personal finance features.

FlashFi combines portfolio tracking with personal finance tools:

If you only care about tracking your investment portfolio, both tools work. If you want your entire financial picture — including the cash in your bank accounts and the debt you owe — in one place, FlashFi covers that and Ghostfolio does not.

Data Privacy and Control

If data sovereignty matters to you, Ghostfolio has a clear advantage. Self-hosting means your financial data never leaves your infrastructure — no third party has access. You control the database, the backups, and the encryption.

FlashFi stores data on managed infrastructure with no self-hosted option. If keeping financial data on hardware you physically control is a hard requirement, self-hosted Ghostfolio is the only option here. If you are comfortable with a SaaS model (as most people are with banking apps and brokerage accounts), this may not be a deciding factor.

Where Ghostfolio Wins

Where FlashFi Wins

Who Should Choose Ghostfolio

Ghostfolio is the right choice if you:

Who Should Choose FlashFi

FlashFi is the right choice if you:


Try FlashFi — Start Tracking

By David Brougham